This paper presents a semi-automatic methodology for evaluating the geometric reliability of HBIM models through the integration of visual programming techniques within BIM environments. The research addresses the challenge of reconciling the parametric standardization of BIM with the geometric complexity and uniqueness of historical architecture, focusing on the need to quantify deviations between survey data and digital models.
The proposed workflow is based on the comparison between point clouds derived from architectural surveys and corresponding HBIM elements, using a Visual Programming Language (VPL) implemented in Dynamo. As illustrated in the operational pipeline (Fig. 3, p. 798), the method involves the import of point cloud data and model geometries, computation of normal vectors, projection of points onto model surfaces, and calculation of distances to evaluate geometric deviation. These values are then classified according to predefined reliability thresholds, generating a Level of Accuracy (LoA) and automatically updating model parameters within the BIM environment. Visualization outputs (Figs. 7–9, pp. 799–801) enable the identification of low, medium, and high reliability zones through color-coded mapping.
Results demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly reduces the time required for reliability assessment and supports iterative model refinement through semi-automated feedback. The study highlights the potential of integrating algorithmic processes within HBIM workflows to improve transparency, reproducibility, and accuracy in heritage modeling, while emphasizing the interpretative nature of digital reconstruction and the importance of explicitly declaring model reliability.
